Éloge de l'amour (Jean-Luc Godard, 2001)
1. Anarchism like all great things is an Announcement! The most vital right is the right to love and be loved and to obey no fixed definition of love, certainly nobody else’s, its also being critical that we curb/chasten those whose current settings find them exploiting and managing loving and being loved like they were the general manager of a sports franchise.
2. In a letter to the anarchist Alexander “Sasha” Berkman, Eugene O’Neill, the great dipsomaniac American playwright of Irish descent, writes the following: "As for my fame and your infame, I would be willing to exchange a good deal of mine for a bit of yours. It is not hard to write what one feels as truth. It is damned hard to live it.” The Universal Anarchist returns like Nietzsche to Heraclitus, the greatest of the Pre-Socratic literalists, and to his two preeminent images of what the universe is like: the river you cannot step into twice because of its constant busy motion and the outdoor fire that embodies the elemental flux of all that which is. That’s practically already a post-industrial quantum model and we sure don’t find anything like that in either Plato or Aristotle, though just over three hundred years before Christ, the Greek philosopher Democritus came up with the concept of atoms, an accomplishment I believe deserves a good deal more open discussion and public celebration that us moderns are inclined to extend it. We’re busy. With what? We’re watching Desperate Housewives. We’ve got our feet up...we're watching other people worn down and humiliated for a change...
3. Antonin Artaud, “Cinema and Reality” [1927]: “A cinema which is studded with dreams, and which gives you the physical sensation of pure life, finds its triumph in the most excessive sort of humour. A certain excitement of objects, forms, and expressions can only be translated into the convulsions and the surprises of a reality that seems to destroy itself with an irony in which you can hear a scream from the extremities of the mind.”
4. Anselm Jappe, Guy Debord [1993]: “Rather than create entirely new forms, the Letterists wanted to take already existing elements and rearrange them. To this appropriative technique, derived in part from Dadaist collage, in part from a kind of distorted quotation favoured by both Marx and Lautréamont, they gave the name of ‘détournement.’ Détournement involves a quotation, or more generally a re-use, that ‘adapts’ the original element to a new context. It is also a way of transcending the bourgeois cult of originality and the private ownership of thought. In some cases the products of bourgeois civilization, even the most insignificant ones, such as advertisements, may be reemployed in such a way as to modify their meaning; in other cases, the effect may be to reinforce the real meaning of an original element—a sentence of Marx’s, say—by changing its form.”
5. There is a truly delightful near-throwaway moment in Chris Marker’s sublime The Owl’s Legacy, a 1989 documentary series about the legacy of Greek philosophy and culture. Marker has his camera trained discreetly for a moment on five or six men in animated discussion on an Athens street corner and the voice over observes dryly that the men on the streets of Athens are still acting the same way they did in Plato’s dialogues.
6. In a conventional and tired scenario the anarchist will find themselves interrogated by newbies and simpletons. Voices shrill and blood vessels bursting, your hopeless and adrift peers will get angry at you because they assume you must believe there should not be any laws to govern the citizens of national states. “Far from it,” you are encouraged to rapidly counter, “law and the criminal justice system are the best proof we have of actively existing anarchy on a daily basis. Law exists in the first place to do its best to mitigate against all the ambient anarchy kicking up dust devils down the corridors of power and doing it all remote while enjoying a whisky sour in a bar by the Eiffel Tower. I’m quite fond of James Gray’s imperfect 2008 family crime opera We Own the Night which tells the story of two brothers in New York, sons of Robert Duvall’s stentorian and distant cop father, who split down opposing lines in early adulthood, one pursing the police work like pa and the other angling in the direction of the underworld, increasingly diabolic in his descent. The basic social set-up is one I like to imagine we all instinctively know—and it’s definitely operative in a number of Michael Mann films—cops and robbers have spent so long looking into one another’s business, their social circles increasingly circulating together, that it is now time to state outright that cops and robbers are married and somebody needs to intervene.
7. Our three main obstacles to growth, cooperation, care, and sustainability have been our main problems since at least the French Revolution. The problems, intractable-seeming because they probably are: Education, Political Economy, and Law. I don’t have even the slightest idea how we as a species are going to find ourselves negotiating all the trouble extensive of there being so many people and a great many of them squashed together in alienating urban conditions. If you want to try to start having hope again somehow, from here on the ground in Western Canada in early March of 2026, I'm telling you straight-up that intelligent machines are the only sensible game in town.





































