We’ve been throwing around a very basic concept we believe relates decisively back to the writings and mad, nomadic proselytizing of Philip K. Dick and which you can see demonstrated it would appear on purpose in Charlie Kaufman’s excellent 2020 Netflix movie I’m Thinking of Ending Things. The crux of the biscuit of whiskers here on display is that if at any time a higher intelligence could interfere in your mental and your sensory processes and put you back down afterward in a modified reality, doesn’t that mean that any time you so much as blink it’s conceivable you’re no longer in any proper sense you anymore and could in fact be existentially altered along with the phenomenal reality in which you are immersed and which seemingly contains you, territory of territories and illusion of illusions? What unites us above all is a biosphere we’ve all squatted down and shit inside of, breathing to a mortal soul the same bad fruity vape air. It would be mortifying to stand up and speak up only to get mowed down by a volley of flippant commentary, then get caught in abrasions in the tissue paper that separates us, raw little fetal-pig-pink us at the back of the incapacitants’ bus, like the little wieners they sell at the Petro-Canada, each wrapped in wax paper and placed on the bus seats pleasingly and neatly like in an uncommonly orderly nursery. It’s a big Ten-Four there, Pig Pen. George Gurdjieff addresses one of the more resilient human models or types, traceable back to antiquity, endlessly recycled in the form of living persons still among us even at this present moment: delusional, physically mechanical, overactive of imagination, eyes more than normally or even alarmingly wide in the patented style of noted barn owl impersonator Elizabeth Holmes. Gurdjieff believes that actors and German-speaking people are especially likely to be like this and very often at low points in their lives find themselves sitting scrunched up in a corner for an extended period of time, staring in terror at a door. Who is to say, Isaiah? Is Gurdjieff right? Being right wasn’t the point until thugs made it the point and we stepped discreetly back and let those indelicate and impatient thugs run this operation tits-up. “If we knew what a number of people are actually dead and what a number of these dead people govern our lives,” chastens Gurdjieff, whirling dervish and intergalactic blunderbuss, “we should go mad with horror.” Mad with horror is definitely an option. Change isn’t something you opt into or out of. Change will have her work order filled, thank you very much. If you have to throw hands go ahead and throw ‘em. Now is the time for dukes up and come-what-may. We all owe our mothers a couple times over. Collectively we intuit this. The imago is the pedestal upon which all that which continues to stand continues to stand. When the whole world is a great big open field hospital, everybody is going to need their mother to hold them and say that they’ll be okay. Human beings have feelings even when others have decided that they are not human beings in the full and proper sense, whatever that could ever possibly mean. Most categories fail to do justice to life. The problem of supremacy is there is no real concrete people walking the earth today, but rather mathematical reductions and abstract transducers with terrain almost as foggy and broken up as the faculties of apperception testing it, inconsistently and with however much self-deception, this not exactly being laboratory work with controlled variables. Statistics can’t predict the future but they will help you become obsessive and errantly analytical until you are feral as a gooned badger, some primordial gambling addict, or worse. If you aren’t a microfascist then most things, non-public things, aren’t any of your business…and it’s no small relief. Extreme or unnatural events, catastrophes human and natural, loss of a limb or a marriage, a pitcher’s highly irregular no-hitter streak, naturally drift back toward average performance over time, yet people constantly invent causal reasons to explain the swings and dips on the graph, narrativizing and personalizing. If you want to know the best way to predict the future, well, just listen to what the folks in the church basements of A.A. have to say: the best predictor of future behaviour is past behaviour. Don’t say we didn’t warn you. Specialists today do not yet know how to calculate the extent to which creatural perception is randomness and chance. Probably well over 90% of your life is randomness and chance, with you over in the corner, a little bashful, having a go at various, spurious shapes you may or may not have once assumed in previous incarnations or within the murky instruction of dreams. In the 1964 Czech parody western Soda Pop Joe (A.K.A. Lemonade Joe), directed by the always reliable Oldřich Lipský and set down in a stately if somewhat gaudy fantasy Old West full of lust and the profit motive, the fictional outpost of Stetson City, Arizona, Lemonade Joe ambles into town to aggressively pitch and extol the virtues of the magical carbonated beverage Kolaloka and, teaming up with temperance advocate Winnifred Goodman, to help set up a dry saloon and drive all the vice and banditry out of town for good, this bringing on the menacing predations of shape-shifting contract killer Hogofogo, hired by the saloonkeepers and racketeers to clear out and/or put down the clean living vermin. To our eye, Lemonade Joe looks more Norwegian or Swedish than he does Czech. He sort of comes off as conspicuously clean. All of Soda Pop Joe is shot through the full old-time array of colour gel filters so all the various scenes of topsy turvy Soviet Bloc Old West mayhem and bluster look like they are happening inside all the different various flavours of Gatorade. There is a little light minstrelsy and we confess that it does not much help matters that it looks like it is taking place inside of somebody’s urine sample. At the end of the picture, in order to appease the Soviet censors, the whole town becomes a labour co-op tasked with producing an alcoholic lemonade called Whiskola. It is a brisk and charming oats-and-a-six-gun genre movie squeezed like ectoplasmic paste through the Cold War looking glass and not unlike other better known Czech New Wave classics from the period, both in terms of temperament and basic approach. History wears our defects and is the theatre of our unceasing folly and there are times when the cinema flourishes and times when it flounders. We’ll leave you with this: one of the all time great boom years in Hollywood was, notoriously, 1939. Some people had especially good years that year. Irascible master Monument Valley pictorialist John Ford somehow made Stagecoach, Young Mr. Lincoln, and Drums Along the Mohawk, and portly character actor Thomas Mitchell, famous perhaps most especially for his skill at playing a loveable drunk in comedies like Howard Hawks’s 1934 gem Twentieth Century, appeared in the aforementioned Stagecoach as well as Hawks’s Only Angels Have Wings, Mr. Smith Goes to Washington, Gone with the Wind, and The Hunchback of Notre Dame. That’s not a year…that’s a technical knockout.
















.jpg)
