Sunday, January 10, 2010

Palm Springs International Film Festival: Day 2

Day two. Saturday. Holy upside-down Christ! What a fucking day! I haven’t seen anything like this before. This is really a fucked-up festival. Man alive. Two films provoking walks outs and, in the case of the first one, near Rite of Spring-style rioting. These people do not like their good dollars being spent on confrontational art. Holy shit. You would not believe what crazy fucking fun I had today. Dogtooth, the aggressively weird and hellaciously salacious Greek import w/ distribution from Kino International, just plain fucked people up. It was awesome. Two waves of walk-outs the likes of which I’ve never witnessed. It was like Paris in the twenties in there. I was afraid someone might storm the projection room. Someone could have gotten killed. If those old ladies don’t get a refund someone might just die for it yet. So awesome. You can’t get this shit on DVD. Palm Springs, man. They maintain the lowest ticket prices of any festival in the United States, they only play two short adds before each screening (unlike Canadian festivals which roll over like skid row slags for their sponsors and unspool upwards of fifteen minutes of pre-film promos), and they are not afraid to piss off the non-converts. Again, I get the impression that people come here w/ some form of amnesia that prevents them from remembering how much they hate European cinema, how enraged they were last year, and leave temporarily vowing never to return. It’s absolutely hilarious. I cannot remember the last time I had this much fun any goddamn place!

Needless to say, a hell of a second day. Two great films about language, power, and obfuscation in very, very divergent styles:




Kynodontas / Dogtooth


Hard to know where to begin w/ Dogtooth. I guess it’s kind of about how we can be suffocated to death by protection. It is just so giddily, aggressively odd and unsettling. I’ve never seen anything like it. It’s absolutely singular. Like if Lars von Trier, Michael Haneke and Samuel Beckett tried to make a film based vaguely on the recent story of Austrian psycho Josef Fritzl and his family. It is a very funny film on a lot of levels, none of them indicative of sound mental health. A family where nobody is named. Father is some kind of industrialist, working in a factory that produces God know what. He keeps Mother, Older Daughter, Younger Daughter, and Son (those are their names in the credits) locked up in the house and its adjoining yard (w/ a pool!). He has created a world for his children w/ an absolutely berserk psychic topography, filling them w/ completely insane ideas about how things work. The children are told that they will die if they leave the compound. The only way to survive is in his car. They will not be allowed to learn to drive until they have grown something called a “dogtooth.” They are told that their mother is pregnant w/ twins and a dog. Words have all kinds of twisted meanings and gnarled logic rules the day. Vaginas are “keyboards.” A “pussy” is a dining room light. “Zombies” are a kind of yellow flower. The film is episodic and shot w/ lengthy takes, mostly close-ups. When there are establishing shots they don’t work like establishing shots. The close-ups and medium shots have a quality of interchangeability. The montage is very odd yet totally precise. Scenes and sequences develop their own geographies slowly but surely, like a world the viewer is building in their own brain as the sensorium tries to situate itself, sounds from one scene overlap onto another, often the sound cuts out all together, and the whole film has the quality of a patchwork w/ holes in it, much like the language within the film, which is in a constant state of being modified and expanded upon, bumping into walls, hiccupping, stop-start lurching, knitted together by the experimentations and odd game-generating activities of the adult toddlers, developmentally stalled as they are, intractably bound up in polymorphous perversity and unable to direct their sexual drives toward any kind of utilitarian end, so constantly searching, fumbling, spazzing, playing around. This family has developed its own semiotic realm at once confused, elaborate, and wickedly amusing. This sense of language functioning from a degree-zero is very reminiscent of Beckett’s plays. Apparently if you speak Greek, a really upset Greek guy told me after the screening, Dogtooth is even stranger. We never have any idea why Father keeps up this ridiculously complex charade, how exactly Mother figures in, or how a man capable of thinking the way Father does is able to pass in the outside world. Invariably the film is partially about that. How little we know of guys in suits who keep their cards close to their chests. The only time we see him communicating at the office it is to explain to a co-worker why his wife doesn’t like having visitors. But the outside world is not entirely held at bay. Father brings home a blindfolded female security guard named Christina from the factory whom he pays to regularly fuck the Son (who looks like a young Russell Crowe if you kept him in yr attic for a few months), until she starts bribing Older Daughter to lick her keyboard in exchange for gifts like a hair band that sparkles in the dark and hair gel. Older Daughter persuades Christina to trade her two video cassettes for a week in exchange for a final keyboard licking, because what the fuck does she need w/ hair gel? Father finds the tapes, duct tapes one of them to his hand and then repeatedly bashes Older Daughter over the head w/ it. Later he beats her so nastily w/ the VCR I think the fat girl I was sitting next to actually started crying. At this point Christina is no longer allowed in the house, blindfold or no blindfold. So Father gets the idea that Older Daughter should have to fuck Son. The ensuing sex scene, awkward and uncomfortable (you think?) produced the first wave of very loud and vociferous walkouts from the audience. There is levity, however: cutting away from the sex to the two of them lying next to one another in bed, Older Daughter tells Son: “you do that again, bitch, I’ll tear yr guts out!” Later Older Daughter, apparently pretty fucking sick of the status quo at home, smashes her own face to smithereens w/ a small dumbbell in front of the bathroom mirror, spitting her teeth in the sink. Again, a thunderous wave of walkouts. Older Daughter, bloodied-up in her nighty, missing a bunch of teeth, hides in the trunk of the car. The family searches for her to no avail, barking like dogs to ward of the murderous cats that they figure must have gotten her, Father having warned them that a cat can eat a person whole after Son disemboweled one w/ hedge clippers subsequent to its having happened to hazard onto the lawn, Younger Daughter calling out “Bruce!” as per one of the many games the girls have concocted in which Older Sister moves around the room and sits in various places and positions, moving her head in recognition of the name Bruce. The next day, nothing resolved, Father drives to work and parks out front. He goes into the factory. The camera holds on the car’s trunk for an inordinate period of time. Nothing happens. I’m guessing Older Daughter probably suffocated in there. The end. Holy shit! Nice!

A-





Politist, adj. / Police, Adjective


Another in the ongoing vanguard of dryly comic and methodical Romanian films focusing on institutionality and individual estrangement, Police, Adjective, by 12:08 East of Bucharest director Corneliu Porumboiu, brings a whole new meaning, along w/ its title, of course, to the expression “arguing semantics.” A slow, methodical film about onerous policing (verb) in the director’s hometown of Vaslui, suggesting the drudgery of the work and the alienating character of the urban landscape, and shot in the style film theorist Laura Mulvey called “liminal” in relation to Chantal Akerman’s hyper-minimalist masterpiece Jeanne Dielman, 23 Quai du Commerce, 1080 Bruxelles, meaning that it resists temporal elision and perspectival fragmentation in favor of fixed perspective and a focus on the drawn-out duration of actions and gestures in real time (which in turns means that much of the Palm Springs audience was bored as fuck and not shy about verbalizing it to those sitting close by, requiring them to be repeatedly shushed and, failing that, threatened and asked to just please go home already by yr humble reviewer). We follow bored and increasingly annoyed plainclothes cop Cristi as he follows a trio of teenagers involved in covert hash smoking, trailing them to and from nondescript buildings and urban hangouts, often spending hours waiting for something to happen, smoking cigarettes and passing time. He occasionally prepares and goes over at length various detailed (and very funny) reports on the very little that he is accomplishing. This dryly humorous, caustic, and ultimately sad and trenchant film spends a lot of time focusing on down time in between minor interactions, most of which have to do in one form or another w/ the vicissitudes of language, law, and authority as each relates to the other. Though the powers that be are anxious for Cristi to close the case and bust the kid who is passing around the joints, Cristi believes that it is wrong to punish the kid for an essentially harmless crime, is suspicious of the other kid, who he terms “the squealer” and who is nominally ratting on his own pal, and thinks the cops should just sit tight until the suspect’s older brother, whom Cristi suspects of being the source of the drugs, returns from one of his regular trips to Italy. He kills time avoiding having to agree to set up a sting and arrest the kid. He argues w/ a co-worker about why the portly co-worker would suck a foot tennis, claiming that there is a law correlating an individual’s sucking at football and the consequent certainty of his sucking a foot tennis. The two argue the semantics of this “law.” Later a half-drunk Cristi argues w/ his pretty grammarian of a wife over the lexicographical implications of a cheesy song she insists on repeatedly watching on YouTube. When he finally confronts his captain w/ his refusal to set up the sting, the captain uses a dictionary to dialectically manipulate language to undermine Cristi, forcing him to define word after word – “conscience,” “law,” “moral,” “police” – until Cristi has been turned completely inside-out. The film details how Cristi is alienated by pointless, deadening labor only to be subject to the manipulation of language to authoritarian ends in a process which disempowers and confuses him, divesting him of agency and forcing his complicity. Language is a heavily polarized chess game, grounded in this case in a political culture not long removed from its totalitarian origins. Police, Adjective is as dry as a coal miner’s cough, but it is very funny and incredibly astute. It is very much another commendable achievement in the ongoing renaissance of one of the most flourishing and singular national cinemas currently in existence.

A

Saturday, January 9, 2010

Palm Springs International Film Festival: Day 1



Ah, the film festival: the last outlet for the clean and sober spree-happy addict that I am; a time of overindulgence, unswayable all-systems-go immersive indulgence; weeklong retinal-aural bliss-out. Nothing beats a good film festival. This is my first in Palm Springs and may well be my one and only opportunity to sample its various nefarious delights. Palm Springs, after all, is no place for a thirty-year-old heterosexual writer-musician-whatever. This is not the place for me and it never will be, but that doesn’t mean I cannot take full advantage of its damn fine art gallery, sundamaged, rutting celebrities (was that Cloris Leachman enjoying the avocado club sandwich at Rick’s?), and even the occasional cultural event that is not taking place in a casino and featuring some washed-up crooner of yore or avuncular stand-up comic.

The line-up in for the World Cinema section is good here. The Palm Springs International Film Festival prides itself on this. They annually screen every country’s submission for the Academy Award for Best Foreign Language Film. They are, in fact, the only festival in the world that scrupulously goes about doing this. Which is pretty cool, but would not work if they didn’t also bring in stuff that doesn’t have that disempowering stamp of approval from governmental funding agencies and the diplomatic corps. Luckily they appear to be keeping things sufficiently interesting in this regard. There is also a spotlight on new Australian cinema this year, which I will be sampling some of and which is undoubtedly a good idea. It is an underrepresented national cinema that at its best effortlessly competes w/ any in the English speaking world, and it has been a little while since I’ve caught a reasonable dose. Cool. What else? This year has already, before the proper commencement of festivities, seen one newsworthy story break. Arms of the Chinese government, in all its anarchic cartoon Stalinism, have reached out to withdraw both of the Chinese films that were supposed to show up here (City of Life and Death and Quick, Quick, Slow) after the festival refused to itself withdraw The Sun Behind the Clouds: Tibet's Struggle for Freedom the existence of which (and the festival's unwavering intention to screen it) pissed off the Chinese for obvious reasons. This is too bad, as clearly City of Life and Death was the big discovery at last year’s Toronto fest, and was one of the films that I was most excited about. Alas. Them’s the breaks.

All in all the first day was a real promising blast-off. The crowds are huge here, and full of ridiculous bourgeois scum and people holding appallingly stupid conversations in the extremely lengthy lines (except for Polytechnique, amusingly, which attracted approximately ten of us, despite the presence of the lead actor at the screening, going to show that English Canada is not the only place where nobody goes to Canadian films). Today in line for the new Michael Haneke a woman behind me actually extemporized that Barack Obama's politics were, to her mind, well to the left of Attila the Hun's. Attila the Hun? Attila you dastardly proponent of collectivized farms you! Attila w/ yr five year plan! Goddamn Hun apparatchik! Fucking moron. I wonder how long this woman lasted in the two-thousand-strong baffled audience for the Haneke, filling every last seat of the Camelot’s main theater, many noisily making their exits as the film progressed, finally leaving us w/ a substantially less packed-to-the-rafters group of people who had not just apparently stumbled unknowingly upon their first European film. What a pissed off group of old white people in shorts and white socks that remained though! I, of course, was pleased as punch by the whole gleeful clusterfuck. This is going to be a strange-ass weak!

Anywho: without further ado, my first day’s screenings:




Fish Tank


Andrea Arnold’s second feature, after the well-received CCTV downer Red Road, is so determined to pay homage to the bleak tradition of unflinchingly dower kitchen-sink downers that have long met programming requirements for British TV, that she and DOP Robbie Ryan have shot this BBC and Film Council-funded bleak house in blocky and boxy 1.33/1 ratio w/ a surprisingly good eye for television-scale compositions. The camera spends a lot of time tracking after determined fifteen-year-old aspiring hip hop dancer protagonist Mia (the very credible newcomer Katie Jarvis overplaying her hardened insouciance because that’s what her character would do as a means of survival and emotional defense) in a way that suggests the influence of Alan Clarke’s steadicam urban roadmappings (see the original Elephant (’89) and the appropriately named Road (’87) especially), also shot in the 1.33/1 ratio (though they, unlike Fish Tank, debuted on television and were not intended to be shown on theatrical screens). More than the television work of Clarke, though, which tends to be smooth and ascending, the documentary kineticism of these tracks – often from behind, yo-yoing over-the-shoulder, or in profiles that slap the vigilantly restless protagonist against the skuzzy urban gridwork like something trying to escape a spider’s web – makes them resemble those that show up repeatedly in the contemporary films of the Belgian Dardenne brothers, whose Rosetta (’99) clearly informs Fish Tank in ways that are not always flattering to Arnold’s film, the inherent poetry of which is more forced and less delicate/immanent than that of Rosetta. Compared to the slew of films over the years that have focused on down-but-not-out lives in the miserable confines of English council estates, however, Fish Tank stands up as a powerful and first rate offering, rhythmically and visually alert, as well as showcasing a natural ability to glean crystalline moments from its ugly Essex w/ its emptied out wastelands concealing a beauty that the film repeatedly ferrets out when least expected to. These films always walk a tightrope between proffering condescending portraits of their vulgar, stupid, and reflexively violent working class characters on the one hand, or demonstrating how social imbalances and organizational institutionalization of class structures creates the conditions in which individuals are stripped of the privilege of being able to make moral decisions or the option to treat others w/ anything like the respect w/ which they themselves would like to be treated on the other. I very much like how in Fish Tank a lexicon of grievance, anger, and contempt persists even when the characters are trying to express love and understanding for one another. Mia will repeatedly lash out w/ vitriol at her mother and sister, and especially at her mother’s boyfriend Conor (Michael Fassbender, who is way too much of a hunk to ever quite fit in here, and whose character is so anachronistically sensible he even backs into parking spots), for whom she progressively develops confusing sexual feelings, at exactly the moment that feelings of love-or-something-like-it are excited. When Mia leaves the family nest at the end of the film, having fucked Conor, who then retreats from their lives and the pursuit of whom reveals more secrets, lies and painful self-realizations, her little sister sobbingly tells her that she fucking hates her only to embrace her in a hug. Her beautiful drunk mom tells her to fuck off already whilst dancing to Mia’s Nas CD, only to then join her two daughters in a sad and touching cavort to the same music, in which they mirror one another’s swaying movements and try to conceal smiles. Ultimately the film becomes about how facades of toughness and coolness, conditioned by measly living environments and legacies of hurt and abandonment, become entwined w/ how love and devotion become simultaneously expressed and repressed. It is about how sad it is that some people only know how to express love through cruelty because cruelty and fear define their world from the ground up through no fault of their own. Fish Tank is ultimately as compassionate and cruel, or rather compassionate-cruel, as its characters. Fish Tank is a shitty name for this film, however, and not one that helps it look like it has found a way around the problem of positioning its characters condescendingly. Do they really need to be compared to helpless fish?

B+





Das weisse Band - Eine deutsche Kindergeschichte / The White Ribbon


“A German Children’s Story” as the German subtitle has it, which does not survive the title’s translation into English. Haneke has said that he excised that part of the title for the rest of the world because he did not want people outside of Germany to think the film somehow was a nationally specific allegory, but was more than happy to have German audiences believe that it was. Meaning? Meaning that Haneke, as usual, wants his Palme d'Or-winning film to implicate everyone, nobody excluded. And it’s personal, buddy. So yes, Das weisse Band explores w/ lateral moves, calculating elisions, and novelistic digressions that great and perennial 20th century theme: fascism starts at home. The main temptation for misreading the film, however, would lie in wanting to extrapolate from this story of young minds being shaped, disciplined, prodded, and humiliated into supplication before the social-behavioral tenants prognosticated by the principal adult figures in one particular German Protestant village at the dawn of World War 1, an allegory expressly about the emergence of one particular fascism: the subsequent rise of National Socialism and Hitler’s Germany during the adulthood of the film’s teenagers and children. While the film certainly wants us to understand that this connection is there, it is finally much more universal than that. Haneke’s anti-Bilungroman about how raising children is doomed always to pervert them, shot in digital color to allow for natural light to be used at night, and then de-chromaticized to take on the stark b&w of August Snader’s photography from the era, is about how children raised to universalize the value systems promulgated by their parents and community leaders (here represented by The Pastor, The Baron, The Steward, The Doctor, and the narrating Teacher), become aware of the fallibility of these parental figures, the implicit hypocrisy at the heart of cycles of discipline and punishment, and instead of seeing these failing as simply human, develop a spirit of revenge or give in to even harsher reciprocations of the regime of discipline-punishment, judging their progenitors w/ their progenitors’ own values and finding them wanting, turning a newly intensified regime upon their own offspring and thereby perpetuating the cycle. The film is really about how socialization invariably damages the young, rendering us all defective in its attempt to impose its correctives. Haneke focuses on the hungry eyes of the young people, eating up every minute adult failing, registering the pain of unjust rapprochement, concealing the knowledge they possess as well as a deep, troubling animosity. Essentially about a series of cruel events that take place in the village (The Doctor and his horse felled by a strategically placed trip-wire, a farmer’s wife falling to her death through a shoddy wooden floor, the pretty son of The Baron found tied-up and beaten in the barn, the subsequent burning down of The Baron’s barn, the midwife’s Down syndrome child found brutalized and blinded) that are paralleled w/ acts of cruelty witnessed by, enacted upon, or informing the world of these children, and three acts of violence explicitly executed by young people (the eldest son of the dead woman gets revenge on The Baron, whom he deems responsible, by fervently laying waste to The Baroness’s cabbage patch w/ a sythe, the daughter of the pastor murders his pet bird and leaves it impaled by scissors on his desk in the shape of a cross, two young children of laborers beat up The Baron’s son and nearly drown him in order to steel his wooden flute). The film very much follows from Caché (’05), Haneke’s last film (not including the Funny Games remake), a thriller that focused on a bourgeois intellectual whose past was fraught w/ post-colonial guilt, being besieged w/ a frightening array of incendiary reminders of his past. In that film we are given a series of clues that lead nowhere, pieces of a puzzle that cannot be resolved, thus the mystery becomes informed by the central character’s own paranoid guilt. In Das weisse Band, we once again are met w/ a slew of incidents and portents, connections and ambiguities that suggest a puzzle that will never quite fit together. The final ominous sense in that of a secret bond between the children (the film has been compared by many to Village of the Damned (’60) which is actually fairly accurate), a repressed bubble of collusion that remains outside the realm of adult oversight and which one is lead to suspect, along w/ the teacher, has replaced the adult world’s system of justice w/ its own more streamlined and unforgiving version, and that the reason that two of the town’s more innocent children (especially the retarded boy, who is wholly innocent) are punished is based on some sort of perversion of this system of discipline-punishment that is forced to enact itself on persons who are entirely without the ability to resist. Not only does this unseen alliance of the children portend the fomentation of Nazism, it suggests how the exercise of power over children may engender all kinds of extremisms on either end of the political spectrum or entirely independent of it. This is the byproduct of all forms of social-production at the site of its real point of energetic implementation: the consciousness of the child, and by the extension upon the social body of the community of young people (dominated by, as The Baroness says of the village itself, “malice, envy, apathy and brutality”). It’s Haneke most dense, dynamic, and literary film (not made for television). At times it’s kind of like a homage to Henri-Georges Clouzot’s Le corbeau ('43), which was another stark portrait of a town whose raw nerves are exposed and irritated (in that film a small French village during Nazi occupation suffers a mysterious outbreak of poison pen letters). And the fact that Buñuel’s old writing partner Jean-Claude Carrière helped w/ the script here means that there is way more humor (some of it dark, granted, such as when The Doctor viciously dresses-down the midwife. his erstwhile lover), playfulness and even warmth than one usually finds in Haneke. It is his best film since Code inconnu (’00).

A





Polytechnique


Polytechnique is Quebec filmmaker Denis Villeneuve’s attempt to cinematize the 1989 massacre at l'École Polytechnique, an event which still looms large in the consciousness of Canadians and which means that the very idea of such a film was extremely controversial from the moment it was first announced. The film goes to great lengths to demonstrate that it doesn’t exist for the wrong reasons and intends no ill-will to survivors, victims, or the families thereof. It refuses to attempt to get inside the killer (Marc Lépine in real life, “the killer” in the closing credits here), it uses composite characters instead of trying to gaudily fictionalize the people whose lives were directly impacted by the event (sort of: Sébastien Huberdeau plays Jean-François, one of the men who stood by helpless while the women were killed and who did his best to help in the bloody aftermath, but who was so guilt-stricken and traumatized that he ultimately took his own life, which means that there is one particular individual in real life whose story his parallels as actor Maxim Gaudette explained after the screening). Years ago Jacques Rivette wrote eloquently in Cahiers de cinema about what he saw as the morally appalling tendency of filmmakers to aesthetecize historical tragedy, particularly anything to do w/ the Shoah. In the seventies, when the Cahiers entered its sternly-theoretical-but-still-hip period under the leadership of the amazing Serge Daney, such a position became even more engrained. Any film that attempted to use beauty and artifice to frame historical tragedies was immediately attacked on moral grounds. While such positions seem a little outdated these days, Polytechnique spends so much time not existing for the wrong reasons that it never really finds a reason to exist. I was also, I must admit, strangely put off by its b&w gorgeousity. It is intermittently very effective in terms of its look and the incredible amount of tension and sensory shock it exploits. Its sound design is especially stunning. There is clearly one reason, however, that the film was shot in black and white (no matter what the very talented but occasionally vapid Villeneuve says about wanting to minimize the blood and gore (really?)), and that is that nobody wants to have to try and make a typical Canadian university look like anything other than an ugly, shittily lit cinder-blocked hell on earth. The movie wants to look pretty. I cannot blame it for that. But somehow I cannot credit it for that either. Especially when its composite characters and gender politics are so unpleasantly telegraphed in ways that absolutely kill the movie when nobody is getting killed. The main female Valérie (actress and co-producer Karine Vanasse, often framed beautifully to showcase her strident absence of an Adam’s apple) is shown before the carnage begins sauntering through hallways while loutish men bump her about, entrapped in the bondage of high heel shoes, then being frankly told by a prospective employer that chicks make bad engineers because of their tendency to grow up and lay eggs. It’s silly, especially as the male killer is explicitly made out to be a deranged malcontent and not a redolent microembodiment of patriarchal society (he is rather someone who has been especially unsuccessful at fitting into that society). Thankfully Polytechnique waits until Valérie’s unspeakably poorly-written monologue at the end – in which she goes on about how she hates it when people tell her she is strong but demonstrating through her stating this how strong she in fact is, talking about being able to lay eggs and still be an engineer, all of this edited over footage of her working in a hangar and at a desk that looks like a fucking b&w DeVry add – to get around to just outright sucking. Villeneuve’s pretty, fun, and somewhat vacant previous women’s films may not have been masterpieces, but at least they weren’t fucking stupid. Polytechnique leaves you w/ a final impression that finally undoes anything that it might have had going for it. Where Gus Van Sant’s impossible-not-to-compare-it-to Elephant ended pretty awkwardly, this one just takes a crap on the linoleum. There’s a pretty cool upside-down track along a hallway roof’s fluorescent lights that closes the awful final passage. Earlier I also like how swirling snow seems to equate the killer’s spree w/ ethereal natural forces. But still …

C+

Wednesday, January 6, 2010

Top Twenty Films of the 00s

Some decade! It has frankly been bananas. Ten years of war, apocalyptic terrorism(s), madness, global conspiratorial aggregations, the collapse of deregulated markets, black people in the white house, the viral spread of digitality in all of its forms, and the continued outboarding of our brains in our ongoing evolutionary transformation into a particularly complicated type of ant or something. Virtuality increasingly predominates. The cinema, as per, has been right there to clinically catalogue the symptomatologies, serve as test-case host for the microbial agents, and to begin to construct a complex multi-dimensional cartography of our brave new morphological world, setting out to discover its limits and contours, its gradations and plateaus, its depths and its peaks. We have certainly lived through interesting times in these ten years, a propos the supposedly Chinese curse the origins of which have never been established, but which came into popular usage in the 1930s, a decade no less hellishly interesting than the in-some-ways-similar one we have just endured w/ its economic disaster and endgame competition of global extremisms (a fact which may portend a very dark road ahead indeed). For someone like myself who prides himself on his dark sense of humor and fondness for disaster, it has become irreducibly apparent that I am right where I ought to be in the space-time continuum. Part of what has been most appealing to me in these past ten years in how the digital world has precipitated a growing formal grammatical complexity and sophistication in the image culture. I can think of no better example of this complexity and sophistication than that gradually built up by the amazing and globally very popular Bourne franchise, three films spanning the years 2002-2007. No films better exemplify how popular cinematographic practices have so stridently surpassed previous understanding of the medium’s capabilities than this increasingly sophisticated post-global triptych. A further indication of how extraordinary a decade of cinema this has been is that The Bourne Ultimatum fails, despite its not insignificant virtues, to quite make my list of the best twenty films of the decade. Nor, somehow, does Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle (’03), the film that to my mind still best demonstrates how these newly sophisticated cinematographic tools are used to make even the most brazen of consumerist entertainments – owing so much to the kinetic virtuosity of music videos and the nimble, spatiotemporal sculpting first perfected in the sly Marxist parable The Matrix (’99) – absolutely fucking mind-melting. It is clear that cinema itself is at a serious impasse, and that the world of new media is still in the early stages of asserting its dominance over how we make sense of ourselves and our world – how we are entertained, informed, and inspired. Films like Avatar continue to mollify the masses whilst maintaining the primacy of cinematographic spectacle, tied as it is to a public experience in a theatrical setting, in a world that will continue to change, along w/ its image culture, very fast indeed.

A little preliminary explanation as to the nature of the following list of twenty films is in order before it is laid out. First and foremost, there is no objective set of aesthetic, formal, sociopolitical, or historical criteria that informs the choice or these individual films or the order in which they are presented. (I do notice that the vast majority of the films come from the first half of the decade which may have something to do w/ the amount of time I have had the opportunity to live w/ them). The list only exists in order to help me orient myself, because it gives me pleasure – it is, in fact, a taxonomy of pleasures tied to a particular period of time, as such it is a consideration of pleasures that could not have been had at any other time. It is important to me that the films I choose do in one way or another seem particularly important by virtue of both when they were introduced into the world and when they became known experientially by me. It is also important for my enjoyment that the list not be bogged down by too many films by a small handful of filmmakers. If I were to consider more than one film by any filmmaker, I fear that the top five films would all be by Claire Denis which, though absolutely just, would be no goddamn fun at all. It is for this reason – that of my own personal pleasure – that this list of films contains only one film by any given director. Finally, as usual, there are a great many films that could just as easily replace some on the list. It is hard not to include a brief list of runners up. It is almost impossible to come to terms w/ the fact that we have just lived through a decade that includes twenty films that I deemed superior to: Comédie de l'innocence (Raoul Ruiz, 2000), Saenghwalui balgyeon / Turning Gate (Sang-soo Hong, 2002), Um Filme Falado / A Talking Picture (Manoel de Oliveira, 2003), Salinui chueok / Memories of Murder (Bong Joon-ho, 2003), Birth (Jonathan Glazer 2004), The New World (Terrence Malick, 2005), Les amants réguliers (Philippe Garrel, 2005), Solntse / The Sun (Aleksandr Sokurov, 2005), Period Piece (Giuseppe Andrews, 2006), ...a bude hur / It’s Gonna Get Worse (Petr Nikolaev, 2007). And those are just the first ten that came immediately to mind. These lists change over time, anyway. Maybe eventually I can make a top twenty list of my top twenty lists of the 00s. Until then …



20. Forty Shades of Blue (2005)


Halfway through the decade the film to beat as state of the nation address on American masculinity was Forty Shades of Blue, a film paradoxically dominated almost entirely by the performance of an actress, and I’m pretty sure no other film ever quite did. It also overtakes Jarmusch’s Mystery Train (’89) as the best film ever about Memphis. Telling the story of Alan James (Rip Torn at his doddering, explosive, drunken bestial best), a legendary music producer entering into old age and grieving his youth, taking it all out on his young Muscovite trophy wife and mother-to-his-three-year-old-son Laura, played in possibly the greatest performance by an actress this decade (who wasn’t Isabelle Huppert or Jeanne Balibar) by Dina Korzun. When Alan’s troubled adult son returns into the fold and develops feelings for Laura, we watch as these insecure, secretly needy men fall over themselves to entrap her in their confusion, desire, and need to be accredited as men, while Laura retains a total strength and self-composed insouciance, struggling w/ her own feelings but also well aware that she needs desperately to hold on to this life in which she now finds herself, subsumed within a cocoon of wealth and status that can be taken away from her at any moment. This is not the sort of maudlin “adult” relationship material trucked in by American workhorses like Sydney Pollock and Robert Benton, but more the touching and radically decentered poetics of family relations that one finds in the greatest films of John Cassavetes and Maurice Pialat. And the steely Memphis blues of the lighting are gorgeous. This was only the second film DOP Julian Whatley shot (and he has, criminally, only shot one since). He sets up shots for director Ira Sachs here that remind you of the kinds of shots Mark Li Ping-bin would set up for a Wong Kar-wai or a Hou Hsiao-hsien, providing sleek finish to a film heavy in naturalism.






19. Miami Vice (2006)


Michael Mann’s total reinvention of the 80s television cop opera that, w/ its combination of white suits, puffy hair, and ejaculatory gunfights, established him as a major player after his terrifically accomplished but underperforming debut feature Thief (’81), is simply put the best looking digitally shot film that I have yet seen. It is a gorgeous, textural film, that fetishizes everything within its visual field, featuring by far the sexiest shower love scene ever committed to celluloid (which the digital had to be blown up on to for theatrical screening). The narrative and the characters are so streamlined to meet the basic needs of this no-beating-around-the-bush built-to-ride policier, that the flaws of Mann’s other films are nowhere to be found here. There is nothing extraneous forced upon the sleek and compact chassis of this baby. It plays more like a stoned tone poem than an action film, and would probably be the best film made this decade to watch on opium (which would be an ironic thing to do whilst watching a film about vice squad heroics in the first place), if not for the fact that the film is already opium enough. Sorry Karl Marx. I like it.






18. Process (2004)


Speaking of tone poems, Process is a motherfucker of one! Of all the films that I have seen only once, Process is the one that I most wish to see again. Somebody must put this excruciating suicide masterpiece on DVD. It is a must see for anybody who has suffered through recurrent periods of obsessive suicidal ideation. Shot is twenty-nine single long takes of Béatrice Dalle (perhaps my deep-down-in-the-dank-darkness-of-myself favorite living actress), as she is led through the titular process which culminates in her taking her own life onscreen. Before this we witness her onstage theatrical meltdown, a lengthy bout of threeway sex w/ two actors from whom two very realistic performances have been, ahem, excited, the revelation of scars from an offscreen mastectomy, a snack of shattered glass, and the lengthy packing up in boxes of a very substantial collection of books. It is a hypnotic, glassy, and powerful ordeal scored by John Cale and featuring songs by Smog and others, as well as lots of intertitle text and quotations from Don DeLillo etc. Everything about this film is sinister and unapologetically cruel. Guillaume Depardieu, playing the ex-lover of the glamorous suicide-to-be, limps around in his final performance before the amputation of his leg. I have been unable to track down either of the subsequent films that American art critic turned cinematic provocateur C.S. Leigh has made. I can think of nothing more singularly maddening. My ex and I loved this film so much we spent years trying to track down a copy on eBay to no avail. Talking to her recently, I discovered that she still hasn’t given up, though none of her leads have turned out as of yet. It’s that kind of film. You can’t put the fucking thing to bed.






17. Death Proof (2007)


Tarantino once called Jackie Brown something along the lines of his hanging out w/ people movie. Death Proof fits that same bill only more so, surpassing Jackie, his previous high water mark. It is his masterpiece. The list of things he is borrowing from, as usual, is longer than a Fritz Lang anaconda, but rest assured you’ll catch up w/ his childhood love of Dukes of Hazard. Just the lap dance scene alone (playfully excised as it was from the shortened Grindhouse version) references Blue Velvet, Almodovar and his protégé de la Iglesia, Tarantino’s buddy Rodriguez … and he’s paying so many props to seemingly unrelated contemporary Richard Linklatter in the Austin section … or what about all the references to the films of Jack Hill merged w/ Smokey and the Bandit? Opening w/ Jack Nietsche and the foot/ass fetish is the least of it (though it sure demonstrates that yr in good perverted hands like a motherfucker). This movie is a total feminist masterpiece and if you don’t notice that the first time than I recommend that you rescreen Death Proof and pay special attention as the amazing Zoe Bell returns the too-cool-for-Burt-Reynolds-school gaze right as power polarities are putting our portrait-of-a-serial-killer not-so-cartoony-as-we-might-at-first-think antagonist right in the goddamn crux of his own swarthy castratedness, poring Red Rose bourbon on his wounds and weeping … then she grabs a heavy pipe and leaps on a Dodge Challenger like it were a John Ford stallion. The editing is the most brilliant freaked out digikink madness since Miike’s Dead or Alive. I would marry any one of up these bitches AND FAST. And good to see Film Comment on the rack at a Tennessee gulp ‘n’ go! And his best soundtrack yet! More fun than any of us deserve!






16. Ne touchez pas la hache / The Duchess of Langeais (2007)


Though Jacques Rivette, the king of really long French new wave films w/ impeccable mise-en-scène, is indeed adapting Balzac’s The Duchess of Langeais w/ his measured 2007 masterpiece, his French title, Ne touchez pas la hache (which was the title Balzac originally chose) is way better, and the film definitely should have been released in North America as Don’t Touch the Axe. It really is the perfect title for this quietly nasty story of two lovers trying to keep the upper hand over one another, salubriously maneuvering to force the other to make the fatal gesture, keeping everything at the level of a sinister seductive game of intelligence, subversive wit, and intertwining stratagems of ridiculous unspoken complexity, for fear of exposing themselves to courtly humiliation or romantic hurt. Rivette has long proven to be cinema’s greatest adapter of 19th century literary masterpieces, and Ne touchez pas la hache is one of his greatest such adaptations. Jeanne Balibar brings smirky brio to her turn as the manipulative, coy and by-turns-obnoxious duchess, while Guillaume Depardieu is bullish and brash as the in-over-his-head but no-less-malicious Napoleonic military hero freshly returned from darkest Africa to something equally menacing in the chambers of a lady. Something which by turns perplexes, excites, and enrages him. The way their bodies inhabit these extraordinary spaces in their dance of love/hate was no doubt aided by the fact that the actors reportedly despised one another. That it is ultimately the duchess upon whom the axe falls is indeed surprising. As is her resultant reinvention as a barefoot Carmelite nun. Sexy and vicious stuff.






15. Hayabusa / Dog Days Dream (2006)


Perhaps the great underscreened debut feature of the last twenty years, Hayabusa remains so below the radar that it doesn’t even have an entry on the Internet Movie Database. It is the greatest slacker love comedy of all time. A young Japanese couple lose their dignity and pathetic sources of income (he basically collects garbage until he suddenly doesn’t) during a brutal heat wave, and decide to barricade themselves inside the wreckage. This is simply one of the best Japanese comedies of all time. We open w/ a shot of her brushing his teeth whilst he lies in bed. Long takes have been a major characteristic of the finest art films of this decade, but it is rare to see them so well deployed in a straight-out comedy (let alone a debut feature), but Hayabusa may well be the film that rocked those motherfuckers better than any other. Good Lord! As a statement about post-Marx hopelessness and the lives of young people w/ no room to move, this movie is an instrument of comic cosmic war (channeling W.C. Fields, Jacques Tati, Jerry Lewis, and the Godard of Soigne ta droite), begging for an understanding of how hard late market consumer capitalism is on the young, sexy, and terminally lazy. There is no way that most of the films winning festival awards these last couple years even deserve to sit at the same table as this masterpiece nobody saw. Number two of the decade on the list of films that I would give large quantities of plasma to see a second time.






14. Izo (2004)

If cinema is the seventh art then Takashi Miike is presumably on to about the ninth or tenth by now. Just when you think he can’t go any further (than Gozu? Come on!), he takes his game into even more decentered territories with the space-time continuum disrupting Izo, his furthest-out-there alien intervention yet. Telling the story of a time-traveling Christ-figure without the forgiveness part, Miike’s elaborate reworking of epistemology in TV miniseries MPD Psycho gets transferred into purely metaphysical territory, the whole while inventing a new Brechtean street theater approach. Izo is a wonder of digital montage and countercultural archive/database fever. This is the first Miike manga-mash for Chomsky readers and black-kerchief-wearing anarchists. It is his first film for readers of pre or post-kitsch SF. It is many things if not most. At its center is a hero for right now; a warrior at war with all life on earth, with all history as it folds before power’s pen; with all institutions and systems (including laws of astrophysics and molecular biology). Izo is “grudge” as demonic possession, as post-individuated, as post-temporal. The grudge is of us, we are of it. The manifold is open like the universal wound, our struggle akin to the struggle of sperm in search of fertilization (did he get that shit from some educational film?), a fiery yawning of the firmament, and we are always swallowed back up by our ecstatic activity, our accursed share. History is a fire science of revenge. Izo is our wrath and rapier, the eternal return of a fall, skipping down across phonograph grooves of the real. Every name in history is I, said Nietzsche. And the time is always right now, answers the cybercipher. Izo is above us and below, his deathblow conjoins two gravities within a single field of movement. This is the new smoke and mirrors folks.






13. Dying at Grace (2003)


Allan King is a Canadian national treasure. As a Canadian, I cherish the documentary tradition on which my national cinema is founded. It is the only national cinema in the world whose two greatest filmmakers, Michel Brault and Allan King, are primarily known for documentaries. King invented a form of fly-on-the-wall documentary that he calls “actuality drama,” and each of his films has been about other people who represent or act out concerns that are dominating his own life (such as marriage in his unbelievably awesome A Married Couple (1969), which I recently saw again as part of a Canadian cinema retrospective in Calgary – it just gets better). With Dying at Grace, King has made an incomparably powerful film out of his own concerns about mortality. Filmed over the course of one winter in the palliative care ward at Toronto's Grace Hospital, Dying at Grace unflinchingly shows us the last days of five terminal patients, up to and including their final breaths. More than anything else the film confirms how exhausting death is both for those who go through it and those (sometimes, sadly, only the hospital staff) who wait by their side. And finally how peaceful, even transcendent, the letting go.






12. Ten (2002)


Ten conversations involving an Iranian woman driving a car and her various sundry passengers. Fewer camera setups than that. Is Kiarostami not now officially the bus driver of our cinema? the man at the helm, astride the wielding of our gazebox? Well it’s certainly starting to look that way, Bub, and you had better get on board if you want to catch the current of our digital world and its new networks and veins of video truth! What Louis and Auguste Lumière started, the Iranian resistance continues, standing in refusal instead of mere awe. An oppositional poetics confronting the hegemony of silence, the absence of light met with unburied luminosity, vision wrested from the shroud. The truth does not need complications, polyrhythmic abundances, false provisions, when it itself is victory. Not when the liberated senses are the world’s common field. Not when the locally-global stand no longer needs mediation. Kiarostami has won our World War III. Not that that will slow down the bloody losers! This is our infatada against the forces of silence, the presencing absences of any empire whatever! This is our cinema unbridled, under the radar, and it matters very much!






11. Qian xi man po / Millennium Mambo (2001)


Taiwanese director Hou Hsiao-hsien, arguably the greatest filmmaker of the nineties, continues to go strong, having even branched out to make gorgeous and lived-in films in Japan and France. His druggy and opulent Qian xi man po, shot in his homeland and expertly capturing, encased in amber, the Taipei of an ecstasy high, was perhaps better than any other film this decade at capturing the look and feel of the lives young people lived in it. A film absolutely alive w/ electric nightlife color, sensuous decadence and sumptuous decor, focusing most of its energy on the camera-worship of Hong Kong starlet Shu Qi , playing a woman ever in-between looking back on the contemporary action (a solemn love triangle involving a DJ boyfriend and a Hou-type criminal ne’er-do-well) from the not-to-distant future (2011 to be precise). Hou structures the achronological narrative, framed by our heroine’s unreliable narration, as is his wont, around gatherings over food and drink which Mark Li Ping-bin’s roving camera eats up like its in on the feasting, w/ most of the nominal action played out offscreen. Qian xi man po captures our post-global era flawlessly, traversing its nightclubs and tiny apartments w/ effortless grace, as though it were exploring a strangely familiar planet full of both bluesy ennui and exultant beauty. As good looking a film w/ as pretty a cast of characters as you will ever see. It’s a minor work, but gloriously so. One which crystallizes a place and time like no other.






10. DemonLover (2002)


When William Faulkner, Leigh Brackett, and Jules Furthman were adapting Raymond Chandler’s The Big Sleep to the big screen, one of them famously asked Chandler to clarify a few plot points. It turned out that he had no idea who had committed one of the murders in his own labyrinthine novel. One imagines that if confronted to provide the same type of narratological overview of DemonLover writer-director Olivier Assayas would be forced to offer up a similar shrugging of shoulders. His international cyber-espionage thriller (on steroids) about slimy corporate malfeasance in and around the hardcore manga market, is so intricate and opaquely plotted that the viewer is left as confused to its goings on as the average citizen is to the behind-the-scenes machinations of real post-global affairs. Part of the film’s radicality is that the most nefarious agents of subterfuge and domination are its hyper-intelligent and self-sufficient women. Vanguard technologies remain at the forefront of this forward-looking masterpiece in a way that makes it read like the abject unconscious to the Bourne franchise’s ego. DemonLover will be written about at great length in one hundred years, like Conrad’s The Secret Agent was in the last years of the 20th century. This is pure epochal cinema, summing up how we do business and summing up how everything we do is “just business,” while at the same time entering uncharted structural and formal waters that feel eerily familiar because this is a director in full control of his craft even if chaos is, after all, his canvas. People have trouble understanding what is happening in this film…this is not there fault! I have trouble understanding what is happening in this film. The characters have trouble understanding what is happening in this film! Something is being encapsulated here, on both sides of the fourth wall, and you feel it queasily in yr diaphragm; not unlike watching yr TV and seeing two simulacra skyscrapers crumbling into the concrete. DemonLover makes for a one hell of a conspiracy-confusion double-bill w/ Assayas’s subsequent companion film, Boarding Gate (’07).






9. Cowards Bend the Knee (2003)


Although we could not possibly have seen it coming at the time, Winnipeg countermythologist Guy Maddin’s Cowards Bend the Knee (originally made as a gallery instillation to be viewed through peepholes, suggesting the sordid nature of the material) would turn out to be the first and greatest film in a masterful sui generis trilogy (at least a trilogy, maybe more are forthcoming … one can only hope), continued through Brand Upon the Brain! (’06) and My Winnipeg (’07), in which he has constructed a temporally unstuck autobiography, no longer simply imaging-into-existence an alternative history to Canadian national cinema but one for himself as well. Nobody, amazingly enough, has ever done anything quite like this. The conceit is pure genius: make a completely honest film about what a prick you are, how you made your first girlfriend have an abortion and immediately grew cold and withholding towards her, blaming her for everything, and then killed your hockey coach father by being such a huge disappointment to him, but make this film strange and dreamlike and situate it in an era before you were even born … but use your real name. Fill it w/ horrific abject fetal abattoirs hidden within beauty parlors, acts of Oedipal anguish, hands w/ their own berserk autonomy, and an aesthetic that brings to mind flashbulb-lit photos of the hockey stars of yore. This movie reads my soul like brail. I can still hear my own father screaming “skate, skate, BEND YOUR KNEES” at me during hockey practice as a kid. This film almost feels like my own private fever dream (replace Winnipeg with Calgary and off you go). Points also for bringing the film in at approximately one hour. Maddin’s shorts are like premature ejaculations and his features are likely to drag. This cine-novella is the greatest thing since legalized abortion.






8. Rokugatsu no hebi / A Snake of June (2002)


Finally, the greatest film about mediated sexuality in the digital age! Somebody had to do it! Shinya Tsukamoto (who had a hell of a comeback decade in general) is our man, much as he was at the end of the 80s when he made Tetsuo, the Iron Man (’89). Set your cell phone on vibrate and submit to Rokugatsu no hebi, wise elder Tuskamoto’s schizosexual manifesto on the liberation and consequent bracing-back-up that proper desire needs if it’s going to breathe. Control, in the sense required of it for psychosexual enjoyment, must feed from chaos and such chaos must find its chaosmos (on-and-off control-like phenomenon). The biomechanical nightmare cartoon carnality of Testuo has given way to a biomechanical nightmare social realism, of a kind, though it is still hyper-cyber-stylized in that way – that smog and blue concrete manner, in an industrial jazz inferno (it was shot in black and white then tinted blue) – that only Master Tuskamoto Shinya can swing it. Asuka Kurosawa’s Rinko, a help-line outreach worker, becomes lost in a sadomasochistic web of virtual contact, mediated biosocial control, and cell phone self-endangerment tactics, with the viewer admiring the hardwiring and the director/sadist attending to the release of current. This film is like a machine: a sex chair – the kind used to unkink all blocked flows so that full orgasmic root potential can be breached – which can also be used to torture or kill; the best kind of machine, in short: one with mobile parts and counterparts. Tsukamoto is the gleeful sadist at the controls as the maniacal interloper in the film and analogically as its director. One of the best, most radical films of the last twenty years, A Snake of June, with its devo science of desire, works like a computer virus. Infect yourself. Get off.






7. Sud pralad / Tropical Malady (2004)


The greatest new discovery of the decade was probably the New York-educated, queer Thai filmmaker Apichatpong Weerasethakul (‘Joe’ to his friends), whose films continually push forward notions of what cinema is and what it is capable of doing. Sud pralad is one of the most beautiful love stories ever put on screen. Broken into two halves, employing a brokeback structure (a structuralist term which has nothing to do w/ gay cowboys eating pudding) that are often utilized by his films (Sang sattawat / Syndromes and a Century (’06) would use the same approach to strikingly different effect). In the first half, we witness the blossoming of love between confident soldier Keng and shy farm boy Tong. Their growing attraction and intimacy brings w/ it a heightened awareness of the fullness of life, as small gestures increasingly contain worlds. In the second half, a feverish fairy tale suddenly breaks out as the soldier now pursues the object of his affections, now a shape-shifting something-or-other, in a moving primitivist parable (full of tigers in trees, mysterious cattle, and a philosophical baboon) that may bespeak the impossibility, the obscure slipperiness, of queer desire in a culture as stultifyingly conservative as Thailand’s (where Joe’s movies are routinely banned). Sud pralad is an incredible, adventurous formal triumph that ceaselessly discovers new and engaging ways of seeing. It is also tremendously haptic. You can almost touch it. The humidity is palpable.






6. Inland Empire (2006)


“A woman in trouble,” quoth the poster for David Lynch’s greatest movie, shot as it was by the consummate stylist on customer-grade video. And the poster ain’t fuckin’ kidding! Lynch, in his voluble and volatile, sui generis style, has come dangerously close to finding a new form with this video extrapolation of his late-period fugue technique trapped in a twisted web of female psychic collapse. Though just another Möbius strip, it is certainly his greatest achievement, formal or aesthetic, since Eraserhead first emerged from the AFI horse stables. Inland Empire (apparently occasioning experiences of real life synaesthesia in some viewers) was well served by being distributed in the Roger Corman / Barnum & Bailey style, causing it to resemble a (post-global) nightmare slowly sneaking down into our towns from upstairs. An absolute triumph of form in the William H. Gass sense of the word: a thing synthesized by proxy through the most systematic yet precarious set of disciplines, like a monstrous, Rabelaisian house of cards being built along with its own corresponding physics.






5. La commune (Paris, 1871) (2000)


Peter Watkins is one of the great artists of the last half century and one of the last remaining Marxists of high cultural standing w/ anything like a commercial audience in mind. The sprawling La commune, running at approximately six hours in its complete form, was his greatest film since 1974’s Edvard Munch. Using a coterie of nonprofessional actors w/ whom he collaborated carefully, forcing them to share in the research and development as he always does, Watkins restages the famous events of the Paris Commune and its violent suppression by the French republican and Prussian forces of Bismarck in the late 19th century, all in a minimally decorated derelict factory, covering it w/ an anachronistic documentary crew and fabricating hilarious news footage, complete w/ coolly "objective" talking heads. By the end he is even talking to his actors as themselves, reflecting upon the events that they have been reenacting. The mordantly clever device of modern news casters and documentarians participating in historical events to which such access was obviously never available, a device he began using w/ Culloden in 1964, allows for a critique of how history has been and is currently being constructed differently-but-the-same, and how acts of resistance and microcultures which practice such resistance become surreptitiously reintegrated and assimilated by dominant mechanisms of power and historical sense-making. The whole exercise serves to celebrate the universality of movements for emancipation and the fleeting pleasures of order usurped at the ecstatic and violent behest of workers, artists, and intellectuals. Powerful and inspiring stuff, Watkins continues to invent new methods for critically framing history, at once beautiful to look at and endlessly conceptually rich.






4. Bu san / Goodbye Dragon Inn (2003)


Perhaps the cinema’s most quietly profound love letter to itself as an artform, Tsai Ming-liang's Bu san nonetheless suggests that cinema may well be entering the century of its own death, something Godard has been proclaiming for a long time and which is also implicit to his own decades-in-the-making Histoire(s) du cinema project. There is something tremendously punk rock about the minimalist and quiet Bu san, in that its depiction of an empty, or rather emptying, movie house, which is screening Honk Kong action kingpin King Hu’s kung fu classic Dragon Inn, is presumably meant to be partially soundtracked by the walkouts that it itself is guaranteed to provoke from any but the most stalwart of audiences. The movie house in the heart of Taipei, about to shut down for good, is a haunted, gutted realm of the dead. The few who remain are there to worship. Such is the film’s own intended audience. The sounds of ghosts reverberate through its dark, mysterious recesses. There is no film in the world that presents a comparably implacable realm of screen shadows, as the kinetic action plays out in and around and at odd angles to expertly constructed long takes this formally intractable masterpiece of understated grace delivers, dedicated as it is to commemorating the magic-lantern artform that brought us the exultant sculpting of light. Bu san is one for the believers. A postmodern conceit that plays as the highest of high modernism.






3. En la ciudad de Sylvia (2007)


En la ciudad de Sylvia is, quite simply, one of the most sad, funny, moving, and exquisitely constructed works of art that I have ever seen committed to celluloid. On the surface it is merely a film about a beautiful and strange young man, habitually sketching the amorphous charcoal shrouds of women (or a woman that is manifested in each – in his notebook he writes “elle” under one sketch only to promptly add an s) who stalks a strange and beautiful woman he believes to be Sylvia, a chick he met at the conservatory café six years previous, through the meandering streets of Strasbourg (a city in which my first love lived for some time when I most missed her). One is reminded, of course, of Jimmy Stewart’s Scottie trailing Kim Novak’s human question mark through Vertigo’s psychosexually spiraling San Francisco only that in Sylvia the desperation so awkwardly worn on this young man’s face and suffused through his every move demonstrates in a way that I have never seen before what Pasolini once called in a poem “proof of love” – and not just love for Sylvia but for all Sylvias as for the pumping of blood through your own body like a tympani drum as you lie in bed dead sober, more powerful than any drug. This is a film about ridiculous desire and its tremendous gravity, and it encapsulates this like no other work of art I know. It reminds me very much of the three films to have most palpably done this to me so completely before: Au hazard Balthazar; The Devil, Probably; L’Argent. The Bresson film that Sylvia most invokes, though, is Four Nights of a Dreamer, Bresson’s only romance (no matter what Paul Schrader thinks the end of Pickpocket means). This is clearly done intentionally, as director José Luis Guerín has gone out of his way to tell this dreamer’s story in three chapters: “First Night”; “Second Night”; “Third Night.” Amazingly enough, I would take these three nights over Bresson’s four any day. The greatest film ever about we desiring-machine monads, trapped magisterially in our eyes and ears, pumping pure life into the veins of our collective civic self. A miracle of a thing.






2. La captive (2000)


Another film, like En la ciudad de Sylvia, whose formal elegance, impressionistic visual power, and piercing, deliberate cutting invoke both Bresson and Hitchcock, the two most deliberate filmmakers I can think of, Chantal Akerman’s La captive is the film whose DVD I have most persistently returned to over the last couple years like a favorite record one routinely puts on to hang out w/. While not her most important film, or even her best, it is most certainly my favorite. A truly hilarious and touching feminist-surrealist riff on Proust’s La prisonnière, the fifth volume of A la recherche du temps perdu, the film just as readily evokes the patriarchal anxieties of Maupassant’s short story “La femme de Paul,” (transmuted to an era in which the man proper is no longer needed for procreation) w/ its feminine object of desire being taken in by the Sapphic delights of lesbianism driving the hero to drown himself. Simon (played by the hilariously befuddled Stanislas Merhar as a big handsome soft-eyed baby) is so terrified that his lover Ariane (softly querulous, slyly deflective Sylvie Testud, here approaching goddess stature) will end up making out with one of her girlfriends when he isn’t looking that he effectively turns them both prisoners of his desire, the whole while being unable to contain her unrestrained lifeforce, which threatens his masculine pride and his sanity both. The story is like late Buñuel, only better, and it fully demonstrates what Julia Kristeva calls “feminine genius,” a genius in part characterized by the following consideration: “to live means to live for the other, including, and above all, when this is impossible and traumatizing.” Such is the plight of Ariane. And the gift of Akerman. What a supreme gift.






1. Trouble Every Day (2001)


I already said that if I did not put specific limitations around this list Claire Denis would have seriously dominated the top five. Aside from having the greatest film noir title ever, her Trouble Every Day is both my favorite horror film ever and the only film of the past decade that is guaranteed to be on my list of the twenty greatest films of all time. It deserves to take on an absolutely iconic position in our culture. It is the horrifying and intoxicating story of two individuals, played by Vincent Gallo and Béatrice Dalle (!), infected by some contagion released in the wilds of Africa by some sort of never-clarified meddling, causing their mutual sex drives to take a swing for the sublimely monstrous. Denis, more than any other living filmmaker, thinks in cinematographic terms. Nothing has to be translated from the language of literature, theater, or anything else. It is pure cinema-thinking-itself. If you have ever loved somebody so much you wanted to eat them, Trouble Every Day may be for you. Don’t say I didn’t warn you, though. It has taken me over like the contagion that takes over its perfectly cast actors. Everything is perfect, from the obligatory music by the Tindersticks, the photography by the always magnificent Agnès Godard, the bizarre and glorious performances, to the post-colonial critique and wildly out-there violence that nobody saw coming from Denis in a million years. It is simply everything I could want from a movie. Then again, I am not a well person.

Saturday, January 2, 2010

Top Ten Films of 2009

On my front it was a year of much trauma, come-down, humility-by-necessity, recovery, an ongoing project involving getting right (and right-sized) w/ the God of Spinoza, and ultimately a significant geographical move from the Canadian prairie from which I was spawned to the California desert where I am currently biding my time before the next significant move of the chess pieces whose tactical manipulation on the board of the given in regards to which I have never possessed much cunning. Because much of my time has been spent in hospitals, psychiatric wards, and in and around a particularly well-know recovery center (named after a first lady), I saw significantly fewer films than would naturally suit my yen, not having been able to attend nary a single film festival (quelle horreur!). Much of the cinema of 2009 that I have missed, however, I will be catching up w/ in January during the 2010 Palm Spring International Film Festival, hopefully signifying a better year forthcoming all around in this regard (as well, bien sûr, as in others). The films I did see constituted a meager assemblage of odds and ends indeed, bespeaking a year most memorable for the disappointing offerings of a number of top-line cineastes. New works by Tarantino, the Coen Brothers, and Jim Jarmusch managed to curry favor from a good portion of the critics who assessed them, but certainly not from this humble cinephile. Jarmusch's The Limits of Control was particularly execrable (making that two in a row pieces of nice looking shit from him!), compensating for an absurdly thrown-together narrative jigsaw jazz improv (adding up to little more than a glib apology for art over commerce) w/ gorgeous cinematography from Cristopher Doyle and a hipster-cred avant-metal soundtrack from Boris, Sunn O))), and Earth. The Tarantino, Inglourious Basterds, was just as much a goof as its fuck-you-to-spell-check of a title, and joins the overstuffed and undercooked Kill Bill diptych as a film that feels like an indulgent collection of scenes in search of a topology, so movie mad and in love w/ its own possibilities that it forgets to make good on them – and this after his hanging-out-w/-girlfriends Death Proof, a masterpiece of form, fun, and concision. The Coen Brothers’ A Serious Man was amongst their best directed films but felt too often like an awkward attempt to adapt a non-existent collection of vaguely interrelated short stories into a coherent film, adding as it does in its balefully scattershot manner to the already overstuffed canon of the self-hating Jewish kvetching genre, one of the least winning in American popular culture. And its use of dream sequences was so tremendously irritating one couldn’t help but feel like their oft commented upon contempt for their characters (which only ever struck me as applying to the titular character of Barton Fink, a dude who is never really forgiven for his self-righteous shallowness in a film that I love anyway) was finally being turned upon their audience. The other film that disappointed me based on my high expectations for it, but which works significantly better in any regard than the three previously mentioned disappointments, was Michael Mann’s Public Enemies. Mann continues to frustrate me by making the best looking HD films on earth (here practically reinventing how night looks on the screen), w/ the very best action set-pieces, but continually getting so tripped up in narrative and characterization where he resorts to endless cliché, overemphasis, and has a tendency to truck in hamfisted improbabilities. It is becoming progressively clear that he will most likely be unable to make another film equal to the extraordinary Miami Vice. Finally there were the two films based on children's books by exciting and idiosyncratic American independent heroes par excellence. While I liked both Where the Wild Things Are and The Fantastic Mr. Fox, I found that both of them ultimately seemed like exactly what I was expecting. Again, I feel a tad disappointed, though the fault here may primarily lie w/ myself.

These various considerations aside, there were a number of truly wonderful films that I managed to catch this year. The following constitutes the crème de la crème. I am not entirely sure that the films that comprise my top ten have all that much thematically in common. If they do, it probably has something to do, first and foremost, w/ the construction of discourses on masculinity and their problematicization in relation to various sociocultural indicators (though this clearly doesn’t apply to my choice for #1). What they all have in common w/ absolute certainty though, is that they each seemed to come into my life in the exact right place at the exact right time in order that they made that particular space and time implicitly belong to them. They are each a cinematic postcard from 2009. Their insights and particular intensities will always belong to that year and to my experience of it. I am, of course, grateful to each, and would recommend them to pretty much anyone who might ask. To be eligible for the list the only requirement is that the film had to be released theatrically somewhere in North America during 2009, which explains the four films technically from 2008.



10. Tyson


James Toback’s interactive documentary portrait of the famed and half-deranged, half-philosophic prize fighter is a quintessential American story of rags-to-riches tenacity, Sophocles-style hubris, recovery from addiction, and a truly unique ongoing oratorical manipulation of the English language. Listening to Tyson talk is almost as staggering as the life being expounded upon. An extremely sensitive product of poverty and abuse, he is tremendously volatile and at the same time uniquely vulnerable. Tyson’s ruminations shape Toback’s visually fragmented, jittering speed-of-thought film. At once tragedy and high comedy, Tyson must be seen to be believed. Though the man’s version of his transgressions and morally questionable actions is never held up to any critical distanciation, the film doesn’t pretend to be historiography. It is rather an intimate, queasily bumptious portrait that isn’t interested in humanizing so much as facilitating, even when the man shoots himself in the foot or betrays inconsistencies or troubling internal dynamics. There is something heroic about Tyson, and something too sad for words. None of it is easy or necessarily classifiable. That the daughter we see him w/, whom he clearly cherishes, was subsequently to die in an unfortunate accident does nothing to quell this powerful sensation of a man who cannot escape his tragic tendency for retraumatization. And I can think of no better film to see whilst in rehab (!).



9. The Hurt Locker


A film about war, homosociality, and the intoxication of high-tension living, The Hurt Locker is the least judgmental and most involving fiction film to yet focus on the war in Iraq. Following three members of a bomb disposal unit through their highly fraught tour of duty, the film is truly radial in its distillation of its men-only world w/ its fault lines of race, class, and temperament as a locus of sexual tension and destructive pleasure. War is both a drug and an equalizer. It makes an entire population a potential enemy. Suddenly nothing is innocent, everybody is a threat. Some people get off on the adrenaline, others get dragged under. That peacetime domestic family life is the real fear for group leader William James (amusingly named, no?) betrays where the real horror lies. Some are so hungry for war that it’s no small wonder that the species has such a hard time extricating itself from its insidious delights. Our pleasure as viewers is part of an alarming appetite that Kathryn Bigelow’s flawlessly calibrated film makes absolutely no bones about.



8. Encarnação do Demônio / Embodiment of Evil


The return of Coffin Joe is a cinematic happening way too long in the making, given glorious life in director/star José Mojica Marins’s unexpected and giddily exuberant addendum to the series that made him famous in the world of Latin American genre cinema. Zé do Caixão (a.k.a. Coffin Joe) is released after forty years in jail (it’s been about that long since the character last properly graced our screens). Returning to the transformed-for-the-worse favelas of contemporary Sao Paulo, filled w/ drugs, prostitution, and newly institutionalized police brutality, Joe is a force of evil anachronistically outdated, but still eager to find ideal female candidates to bear his demonic Nietzschean offspring. With the help of Bruno (Rui Resende), a retarded hunchbacked grave digger, he quickly picks up where he left off, hindered by a one-eyed cop, whom he deformed in an earlier outing, and a psychotic flagellant priest, Joe sets about collecting and torturing lots of extremely attractive women whilst pontificating on the nature of evil, eternal life, and transcendent pleasures of the flesh and its ritual mortification (think Nietzsche by way of Bataille by way of Count Dracula). He also acts like a pussy and engages in girlish histrionics. The hilarity of Joe, Bruno, and their campily over-the-top adversaries going about gory business in the contemporary world makes for extreme anarchic fun at the joyous expense of good taste. A playfully transgressive cinematic happening for the happily sick, the filmmakers and their cast occupying the real world of contemporary Brazil like sneaky old squatters exiled from some baroque traveling carnival.



7. The Box


The Box, a film that takes off from memories of Richard Kelly’s own childhood (the father has the same job w/ NASA that his dad had), embodies surrealist father André Breton’s notion of “pure psychic automatism” in its free-associative death-dream trip, it’s characters seeming to scuba dive through its berserker set-pieces as in an aquarium that is the frame. There is no freewill in dream as in life – only the nauseating, floating inevitable. The Box, a film about apocalypse like Kelly’s two preceding films, working out Lacan’s hypothesis that a letter always arrives at its destination in a way quite unlike any other film I have ever seen, ends w/ an extreme tenderness for all its incendiary bleakness: a death-embrace of mutual affirmation and stunted acquiescence, husband and wife intimately cooperating in the not-at-all-intimate succumbing of the whole world to the pathogen from which it can only be delivered by surrendering to total inevitable collapse. Though its narrative engine is asleep at the wheel (the film, dream-like and filtered through the child’s complicated frame of reference, fundamentally abiding by oldschool surrealist tenants), the machinery of apocalypse is no less systematically consummated for its basis in a kind of monstrous catatonia. The Box will remain, in its twilit zone of mid-seventies digital-era-dawning art-direction (Donnie Darko style), one of the most messed-up and memorable films of 2009.



6. Bakjwi / Thirst


While many films about vampires have focused on themes of contamination and addiction, none in memory has pursued the latter theme so extensively into the darkly comic realms of codependency run amok as Chan-wook Park's sexy, conceptually exhaustive pop-art opus Thirst. An immaculately designed contraption blocked out cleanly in three specifically delineated acts, the film details the secularization and sexualization of infected priest Sang-hyeon (Kang-ho Song), as he falls in love and then progressively into a state of elastic bondage w/ headstrong domestically enslaved young sexpot Tae-ju (the ethereal and potent Ok-bin Kim), the two of them transforming from careful managers of their addiction to people catastrophically out of control and violently at odds. It is a film, then, about two junkies in love who stay that way well after the love has turned as sick and as compromised as they themselves are. Its sexual politics are not so much self-generatively misogynistic (the female the equivalent of Eve, leading our male protagonist intuitively and amorally down the garden path to oblivion) as it is part of a critique of power polarities and gender roles in a Korean society that babies its men and represses female expressivity. Although we start the film relating to Sang-hyeon, the end leaves us sharing in Tae-ju’s apocalyptic anguish as the two lovers commit ritual suicide by sunlight. Withdrawing junkies really hate the sun. Even more than we worshipers at the altar of cinema!



5. Tulpan


Sergei Dvortsevoy’s slight comic fable about an awkward big-eared ex-soldier named Asa who, returning from active duty to the barren Hunger Steppe of southern Kazakhstan to hopefully start his own farm, hopes to marry the only eligible woman in the barely populated region (the unseen Tulpan of the title), is the surprise feel-good comic triumph of the year. Shot w/ roving pans and intimate handheld tracking shots by erstwhile documentary filmmaker Dvortsevoy, Tulpan takes on the impression of a cheerfully dissolute fable shot on the fly atop a strange, barren planet not entirely unlike our own, where camel, sheep, and human compete for resources and attention, and occasionally a water truck will drive past blaring “Rivers of Babylon.” W/ so little at their disposal, the filmmakers wisely make structuring absences the meat of the matter, and focus lovingly on the day-to-day drama of small lives played out on a canvas of sublime distances and gaping horizons. Dvortsevoy makes his films by living w/ his subjects for a lengthy period before shooting begins (on film instead of the more obvious choice of video, considering the removed-from-civilization conditions in which he shoots), which means that Tulpan feels very much like a film at home w/ these subjects and their struggles. This is ethnography taken to the level of epic poem. It is beautiful, funny, and moving.



4. Chi bi / Red Cliff


Dialectical-materialist history-as-parcels-of-action-and-reaction action fest Red Cliff was easily, until Avatar, the meat and potatoes cinematic spectacle-qua-spectacle entertainment of the year; a dialectical materialist network topology of object and human relations lurching forward w/ pinwheel precision, balancing epic macro and sensual micro, in its adaptation of 14th century Chinese urtext Romance of the Three Kingdoms. Shorn of half the length of the original two-part-and-nearly-five-hour Chinese release – the biggest budget film in Chinese history, as well as surpassing Titanic as that nation’s all time highest domestic grosser – John Woo’s stridently cut new version, prepared for the world beyond Asia, doesn’t seem to bowdlerize the original text so much as simply blast through it DJ style, quickening the piledriving web of intersections, scratching out new headrush breakbeats against the grain of the film’s own internal rhythms, intensifying flows instead of breaking them off. It is rare to see such a massive vision coalesce in the form of such an exited and exhaustive drawing inward – such a total, utter inhalation – of forces, resources, image-images, sound-images, action-images, from the smallest element up to the most awesome. It is so much of the world and of the flesh, in all of its flounce and bounce, that yr heart cannot help but beat along to its. Red Cliff is a blood machine. It pours it fucking everywhere. It pumps it w/ evenhanded control of the nerve meter. It works just so. And it’s a massive little adrenal treasure and a hell of a movie-movie fix.



3. Avatar


Clearly and without reservation the cinematic event of the year, Avatar did not simply live up to expectations as a cultural event and block busting megaspectacle, it managed to cultivate a new cinematographic ontology by equating its central conceit, avatars on an alien planet as the byproduct of genetic hybridization w/ their human agents who control their actions from sensory deprivation tanks on a nearby space station, w/ the immersion of its viewers, sitting back in our theater seats as our sensory-motor equipment is permitted access to the world within the spectacle both before us in one sense and all around us in another. It is clear to even the most cynical viewers, unmoved or even moved to crack wise by the film’s determinedly earnest investment in spirituality and ecology (such people will get out of life the exact nothing that they put in to it anyway), that Avatar is a sign of things to come in the image culture and marks some sort of quintessential moment in the expression of the possibilities of spectacle and its applications in an evolving landscape. I need to see it a couple more times before I write about it at any length. A sure sign that it is here to stay.



2. Bright Star


Jane Campion’s most restrained and carefully modulated film is also to my mind her greatest by far. She is a filmmaker who has long sought to shock and arouse, and what both shocks and arouses here, in her gorgeous and moving love story about John Keats and Fanny Brawne, is that she has found new and understated ways, free of cliché or affectation, to show love, devotion, and inspiration – tricky things all to visualize. This is a sublime work of steady-handed impressionism, at times even invoking the romantic Bresson of Quatre nuits d'un rêveur and the decorous lilting pageantry of a subdued Max Ophüls. Campion’s two actors, Ben Whishaw and Abbie Cornish, give luminous, quietly enervated performances that stir you up without seizing you w/ abrupt indiscretion. They lack gumption or knowing. They are singularly incandescent and guileless, and they grow in the viewer as they do on each other. I fell in love watching this film, reliving the precise litany of sensations, from trepidation to transcendence, that this falling occasions. Bright Star in no mere biopic. It is a love story, pure and simple. A portrait of ascension. A celestial poem of cosmic grace.



1. La danse - Le ballet de l'Opéra de Paris


In Frederick Wiseman magisterial La danse, a work of pure cinematic pleasure, the art of dance is not just thrown into contrast w/ the bureaucracy and consumer capitalist machinations that it requires in order to exist at all, but the smoothed, infinitely opened out spaces where the dancing is done – both the mirror-walled rehearsal spaces that reflect infinitely redoubled illusory reflections outward, and the actual stages w/ their purplish-blue spotlights terminating at a black horizon – suggest plateaus that all this under-rigging supports in the same way money, human labor, and the Lehman Brothers support it. The bodies of these incredible young people, boys and girls (like w/ most great films, I was steadfastly bisexual for the duration), are framed in such a way that we almost never see them reflected in the mirrors when they are rehearsing. They are singular and they command the attention of our entire sensory-motor apparatus. The brain and nervous system dance w/ them. In a way that is somewhat similar to kung fu movies, dancers remind us of Spinoza’s supposition that we are not yet aware of what a body is capable. Dancers are masochist, practicing a kind of bondage. What they do to their bodies to transcend what is thought of as the body, its utilitarian implementation, is staggering, and to see what they do, these beautiful, tormented bodies, atop these opened-out planes, is to witness something as primordial and elemental as the flickering of a flame. Dance is a Heracletean drug. The process of hypnotizing ourselves watching these dancers is similar to the effect produced by the pulsing, silently musical, morphological handpainted films of structuralists like McLaren (whose non-handpainted Pas de deux probably remains the most beautiful dance film ever) and Stan Brakhage w/ the added component of these sexually charged bodies, commingling bodies, bodies that will grow old and die. Wiseman’s formally exquisite documentary is one of the most gorgeous and ineluctably transcendent films I have seen in a very long time. Its beauty and precision were unmatched by anything I witnessed in 2009 by a not insubstantial margin.